A Texas couple has captured what
is being called a baby chupacabra, the legendary animal said to roam the
countryside in search of blood. The "Ratcliffe chupacabra," as it's
been dubbed, was found Sunday in a tree on the couple's property in
Ratcliffe, Texas. But upon closer examination, it becomes clear that the
mysterious creature couldn't possibly be the legendary beast.
The defining feature of the chupacabra is that it's a vampire: Chupacabra means "goat sucker" in Spanish, named so because it is said to drain the blood from animals such as goats, chickens and other livestock.
The
news and video footage of the small, hairless, caged animal went viral
and left countless people scratching their heads, wondering if a
chupacabra (unlike Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster)
has finally been caught. "In Dewitt County, [Texas], most people are
convinced this is the elusive chupacabra," said a reporter with KAVU
News, an ABC affiliate based in Victoria, Texas, though a wildlife
biologist suggested it might be a dog or coyote. Still, others are not
convinced. [Bigfoot to Chupacabra: Our 10 Favorite Monsters]
So, is this animal the elusive chupacabra? It's clear that it's not, because video of the creature broadcast on KAVU clearly shows the Ratcliffe chupacabra doesn't have the anatomical mouth features that would allow it to suck blood, from goats or anything else. Like several other "chupacabras" found in Texas and elsewhere in recent years, a simple look at the mouth demonstrates that it is physically impossible for the animals to suck blood. The mouth and jaw structures of raccoons, dogs and coyotes prevent them from creating a seal around their victims, and, therefore, physically prevents them from sucking the blood out of goats or anything else. This Ratcliffe chupacabra was not seen nor videotaped sucking blood from anything.
Read more:
http://news.yahoo.com/texas-chupacabra-turns-imposter-150633789.html
No comments:
Post a Comment